Skip to main content

Lunch After a Customer Yelled About a Scratch That Was Not Mine, a Car Wash Story

Tâm An mỗi ngày11 min read
A warm cup of herbal tea releasing gentle steam on a wooden table by a sunlit window

"Do you wash cars or do you scrape them? Thirty centimeters, look at it, thirty centimeters."

The customer in the blue shirt stood right beside the driver's door, one hand pointing at the scratch, the other twirling his key ring. Twenty past eleven. The car was still dripping from the door sill onto the concrete, and three other customers were waiting on the long bench under the tree.

I was holding a wet rag, my hands already wrinkled from soaking in soap since morning. I remembered that scratch very well. When the car rolled in, I saw it, looked at it for two seconds, and thought, "he must know already." I did not say anything, did not take a photo, did not write it in Chị Loan's little notebook. Six years of washing cars and I still sometimes think, "he must know already."

Chị Loan, the owner, came out, smiled politely, and offered him a free polish. The customer left. The whole shop went back to the sound of the spray hose.

At noon I sat down to eat. That day I ate like a man in the middle of a quarrel. That is what this piece is about.

An argument you do not win

This is not about who was right over the scratch. I had thought about that enough, until I saw my own face in the bucket of water. And it is not about how to stop being angry, because that day I had not stopped, and a few days later I still had not, not completely.

What this piece asks is smaller: when an argument is still running inside you, where is the plate of rice in front of you?

Rice in the mouth, and the shouting still in the ears

Five past noon. I sat on an upturned paint bucket by the water tap, a plate of shredded chicken rice on my knees. At my feet was a puddle smelling of lemon soap, a pair of wet sandals, a rag draped over the rim of a pail. The sun fell straight on the roof of a car waiting to dry and flashed a white streak.

The chicken rice came from the woman at the foot of the bridge, same as every day. That day I chewed one mouthful after another, my jaw clenched, my chopsticks quick. In my head, I was arguing.

You said I scrape cars. Did you see how long I spent on that car? Did you see that scratch? Of course you did. Why didn't you say something when you drove in?

The spray hose on the far side of the yard kept hitting my ears, steady like someone talking without pause. I was not listening to it. I was listening to the man in the blue shirt.

I got to the dozenth sentence of the argument, and I won every one. In your own head you win all the time, the only catch being that nobody sits across from you to hear it.

Chú Bảy sat two buckets away, wax polish still on his hands. He is sixty-one, a man of few words, with the rude habit of watching other people eat.

"You chew like you're fighting with the rice."

"No I'm not."

"Right. You're not."

He picked a piece of pickled mustard greens, put it in his mouth, and chewed slowly. My chopsticks hung in the air for a while.

That day I told myself: I ate fast because I was angry. True enough. But a few days later it looked deeper to me. I was not eating fast because I was angry. I was eating fast because the argument in my head needed me to chew at its rhythm. My jaw was backing up my head. Each mouthful of rice was a period at the end of an argument sentence, and lunch had been drafted into a second round of the morning, except that this round had no opponent. So there was no moment where it could end, so my head ran on, so my jaw chewed on.

By now you may have met this scene yourself. A meeting where something harsh was said, back to your desk, open the lunch box, finish it, and at the end you cannot recall what you ate. The plate has become a waiting spot for an argument.

What I tried the next day sounds quite absurd. Before picking up my chopsticks, I said the whole sentence I wanted to say. In my head only, start to finish, until I ran out, as if the customer were standing right there.

That day I said it quietly, by the tap, just loud enough for me to hear: "You saw that scratch from the moment the car came in. You only had to say one sentence." Then I stopped short. The next sentence ran out on its own: "And I saw it too. I didn't say anything either."

That second sentence never comes out in the head. You have to say it out loud, all the way, before it will stand in line. I took no lesson from it. All I knew was that after it, the argument had half as many places to lean on.

Practice · 3 min

Say the sentence, then pick up the chopsticks

  1. 1.Before picking up your chopsticks, say in your head (or whisper) one sentence you want to say to the person who made you angry. Say it whole, not trailing off.
  2. 2.Wait one beat, as if waiting for them to answer. They will not, and that silence is where the sentence lands.
  3. 3.Take the first bite. Until you have swallowed, only chew, do not replay anything.
  4. 4.When the argument comes back mid-meal (it will), lay your chopsticks across the rim of the bowl once, then pick them up again.

The sign that I was doing it right was not that the anger faded. I watched for something smaller: at the first swallow, could I smell the boiled chicken before the argument arrived. The first day I caught the chicken at the second bite, and the argument cut back in during the third. That was fine. The second bite was enough.

The first time, I felt a little embarrassed. Sitting on a paint bucket answering the air, Chú Bảy glancing over, me looking away. After a few days, some days the argument got shorter, some days it stayed as long as before. I do not know what that depends on, and I will not guess.

On a day when you only have ten minutes for lunch, cut it down: skip the speaking and keep one thing, laying your chopsticks across the bowl every time you catch yourself arguing. One laying down, one picking up.

Where I slipped was in trying to say it well. I built the sentence to be tight and sharp, so that if I ever met the customer again I would have something to answer with. By the third sentence I was drafting a speech instead of putting anything down, and the rice went cold. It turned out the sentence does not need to be good, only finished. Clumsy, repeated, even wrong, any of that is fine, as long as it leaves your head once.

A dish tied to a bad day

That night my wife braised fish, and the pot was still steaming when I got home. I finished a bowl and a half of rice, a bowl and a half I could not remember eating.

"Is the fish good tonight?"

"Good."

"Good how?"

I opened my mouth and nothing came out. I sat there with my chopsticks, looking at the pot, and understood that the noon argument had followed me all the way to my own table, and sat right in my seat. My wife looked at me for a moment, then put another piece of fish in my bowl. She asked nothing more.

The week after, I did not want the chicken rice from the woman at the foot of the bridge anymore. Not because it was bad. I looked at the plate and saw the man in the blue shirt, the scratch, the long bench under the tree with three people watching.

I switched to rice with pork chop from the place across the street. Three days. The pork chop rice was not bad, but I ate it like borrowed food, and kept glancing toward the foot of the bridge, where the chicken rice woman was setting out stools. I felt I owed her an explanation she had never asked for. Then Chú Bảy asked me something I could not answer.

"What did the chicken ever do?"

"Well... it got stuck to that day."

"That day got stuck to it. When did it ever stick to that day?"

I laughed, but only because I did not know how to argue back.

I am not sure about this part: some people say a dish you eat while sad will carry the sadness forever. I do not know if that is true, so I will not say it. All I know is that for me, the plate of chicken rice had become an object lying next to a feeling, and the two did not separate by themselves.

The usual way is to avoid that dish and swap in another so you do not remember. That works, and sometimes it is right. But if you avoid it forever, that day stays in your head all the same, and all that grows is one more restaurant you are afraid to walk into. What sat deeper was that I needed to eat that dish once more on a day when nothing happened, so the plate could meet a different noon. The dish does not change; only where it stands in the day does.

I picked a Wednesday. Few customers, every car clean from the moment it rolled in. I bought the chicken rice from the woman at the foot of the bridge as if nothing had happened.

Practice · 10 min

Eat the old dish on a quiet day

  1. 1.Pick a quiet day, no difficult customers, no meeting to prepare for.
  2. 2.Buy or cook again exactly the dish that got tied to the bad day. One portion, not two.
  3. 3.Sit somewhere other than the old spot, and look at it for a moment before you pick up your chopsticks.
  4. 4.Take the first bite. If the bad day shows up, let it show up, do not chase it away, only note "ah, there it is," and keep chewing.
  5. 5.At the end of the meal, sit one more beat and notice where this dish stands in today's lunch.

The first time, the plate of chicken rice looked a little strange, like running into an old acquaintance I had not seen in a long while and did not know what to say to. By the third bite it was familiar again. Some people feel lighter that same day, and some need two or three tries before the dish goes back to being food. I was the two or three tries kind.

If there is nowhere else to sit, eating it again in the old spot is fine too. What to keep is choosing a quiet day, and eating one portion only.

Where I got foolish was turning it into a challenge. I heard people say "face it," and by the second meal I forced myself to eat chicken rice in the middle of another bad day with another customer, to prove I was not afraid. I finished feeling like I had swallowed a stone. A quiet day is the day that works. A bad day should simply stay a bad day.

The plate Chú Bảy pushed over

A week after the customer in the blue shirt, Tí, the new kid, got criticized by a woman who said he had not wiped the glass clean, said it in front of everyone, in a voice that carried to the head of the alley. He stood holding his rag, face red, saying nothing.

At noon he sat alone on the farthest bucket, holding a sandwich he did not eat.

I went and sat beside him. The first thing I said was: "Don't be sad. Customers say that kind of thing, it's normal."

He nodded a little. Then he set the sandwich down and looked away. I knew I had said it wrong, and did not know where.

Chú Bảy was passing by. He said nothing. He just picked up the plate of pickled greens from my place and set it down right next to Tí, then went to get a glass of tea. Tí looked at the plate for a while. He picked up a piece.

That was what Chú Bảy had done to me the other day: pushing a plate over, without a word.

Now I think that plate said enough, in a way my "don't be sad" could not. My sentence asked him to change his state. Chú Bảy's plate asked nothing, it only said "someone is sitting here, eat." Put another way, I had said a sentence to feel better about myself, and he had done something to make it easier for the kid to breathe.

If someone sits next to you after a bad day, at a meal there is one small thing that beats every word of comfort, because it needs nothing back from the other person.

The next day Tí walked past the spot where I was rinsing the ground, not stopping, and said quietly: "Yesterday, that plate, I ate all of it." Then he went on. I do not know if he was less sad, and I did not ask. Some things break when you ask.

I did ask Chú Bảy how he knew to push the plate. He looked at me as if I had asked the time with a clock in front of me.

"What's there to know? That plate was the nearest thing to me."

I think he meant it. I also think he said it so he would not have to explain, and I do not know which of the two is closer to the truth. I left it there.

The hard part is holding back from talking. I tried a few times, and kept wanting to add one more sentence to cover the awkwardness. Every time I added one, the plate lost its meaning. So leave it quiet. If the other person does not eat, that is fine, the plate stays there.

On a busy day when you cannot push a plate, pour them a glass of water. One glass.

If you tried it and the argument keeps running

There were days I tried everything, said the sentence, laid the chopsticks across the bowl, sat in another spot, and the argument ran through the whole meal anyway. I thought this just was not for me.

Maybe. But I noticed two things that happen often. The first is that the anger is not sitting in the meal, it is sitting in something I have not told anyone yet. That day I went home and told my wife, the whole business of the scratch in one stretch, and she listened to all of it and only asked, "Have you eaten?" After that telling, the argument at the next meal was much shorter. I do not know whether it was because I said it out loud or because someone heard it. The second is that some days I ask too much of a fifteen-minute lunch: swallow rice, put down an argument, and reset a head that has been running since morning. On those days, just eating to get it done is fine. Eating to get it done is not a failure.

And if you talk to someone who listens and still feel the weight a week or two later, finding someone who can listen more closely is ordinary, not embarrassing. That is beyond a piece about eating rice, so I will only say that much.

If your meals often get interrupted by an argument, eating a meal without holding your phone is one way to free your hands and see what is cutting in. And if you prefer a shorter exercise, meditation for the first three bites lasts exactly three bites.

That afternoon the last car left the shop at six. I sluiced water across the floor once, pushed the foam toward the drain, and stood listening until the water had run all the way out.

The rag hung over the rim of the pail, still dripping.

Related reading